Escape the “Self Esteem” Trap! Today!

Posted by Rex Alexander on Tue 26 Mar 24 in Acceptance, Rating, Self esteem, self vs. behavior, ULA, UOA, USA |


So called “self-esteem” is a fallacy, a racket invented by what I call the “Self Esteem MAFIA”  ~Rex. . . designed to make you feel inadequate so you will buy their crappy books, videos and seminars–and as such things are almost guaranteed not to work, it is highly likely that you will blame yourself therefore feeling even more inadequate, and buying more crappy books, videos and seminars that don’t work.  And the beat goes on . . .

I am going to show you how to begin doing something real that you can do about your feelings of low self-esteem today, right now, that will make a big difference in your life if you apply it.  It will make an even bigger difference if this surprises, delights  and turns you on so you are motivated to pursue REBT in a more depth way.

THE PROBLEM:  So called self-esteem is usually “conditional.”  That means, you tend to make good feelings about yourself dependent upon some external condition or other such as physical appearance, profession, job performance, social status, personal and professional achievement. So, I many love and feel good about myself if I am lucky enough to be physically attractive (according to some arbitrary and changing social standards).  I may think of myself as a “beautiful person” and feel very good as a result.  Which is fine so far as it goes.  The problem is that nothing in the universe is static, and is I inevitably age and my youthful beauty fades—which it will—I may not feel so good about myself;  because I no longer look beautiful, I am no longer a “beautiful person” and thus no longer an adequate or OK person. If I believe that it is terrible not to be a beautiful person, I may feel even worse about myself.  In the extreme, this can lead to clinical depression and anxiety and worse given the phony-baloney mis-diagnosis of “chronic low self-esteem.”  


The same is true about any other attribute, quality, marker-event or condition that you hang your self-esteem on.  I am a successful person only so long as I keep closing deals at work.  When I stop being able to close deals—which will probably be the case, at least to some extent, sooner or later—I may not feel so good.  Naturally, it doesn’t feel very good to fall short of some performance expectation, however it feels much worse if I believe that in doing so, I label myself as a “failure” or the terribly cruel, self-flagellation modern term a “loser.” To counteract this, we can being thinking of a failure as disappointing and unfortunate, but (1) not the end of the world, and (2) as not affecting our “essential self.”


THE SOLUTION: Begin to practice what Dr. Ellis called USA, UOA, ULA; Unconditional Self Acceptance, Unconditional Other Acceptance and Unconditional Life Acceptance.  In other words, you simply begin (right now, today) to accept yourself unconditionally. That is, you stubbornly refuse to equate your performance to your essential self.  You begin “translating” your old way of thinking along the lines of:  Because I failed the test, that does not make me a failure. Because I am losing my youthful good looks, that does not make me an unattractive person.  Because I lost the game, that does not make me a loser. And so on.



HOW:  Immediately, now, today STOP calling your dear, sweet self names, stop over-generalizing, stop labeling.  When you are tempted to say I am a failure (or little Johnny is a failure, etc.) translate that to, I failed the exam, which does not make me a failure.  Now, what can I do about it to improve my performance in future?

We suggest that the easiest way to accomplish this is to choose a concept of self that is resistant to what Dr. Ellis called “rating” or “downing.”  Philosophers and scientists have been arguing about the nature of self for millennium and are probably no closer to determining exactly what the “self” is.  Some people who do credible science and philosophy believe the self to be some kind of illusion. I doubt we will solve the debate or this “hard problem” any time soon.  That being the case, what I think that means is that within rational, sane parameters, you get to choose whatever concept of self you prefer. That being the case, choose one that is difficult or impossible to rate.  Some possibilities, the proverbial “98 cents worth of chemicals,” love, consciousness, a bundle of synaptic responses, an “cloud” of dancing atomic and sub-atomic processes, a system of conditioned responses, and so on.  From our perspective, we don’t really care what your concept of self is so long as it resists “rating.”



For example, my 98 cents worth of chemicals is identical to your 98 cents worth of chemicals which is identical to Joe Sixpack’s 98 cents worth of chemicals, even (OMG!) Hitler’s 98 cents worth of chemicals. Adolf Hitler did despicable, horrific destructively anti-social things, but sorry to say, he was working with the same 98 cents work of chemical as you and I are.  In other words, our essential selves consist of the same “stuff.”  So do you not say “My 98 cents worth of chemicals are better (or worse) than your 98 cents worth of chemicals” as such concepts are semantically null.  There is no good or bad 98 cents worth of chemicals, just 98 cents worth of chemicals.  And these 98 cents worth of chemicals do not become more or valuable or worthy by what I do or do not do, by what I achieve or do not achieve, by what kind of house I live in, by how many books I have read or written or by whether they sell well or not.

Within specific rational limits, feel free to

(1) judge and evaluate your performance, your behavior, your actions and

(2) work your ass off to achieve “task-perfection” but do not judge your dear, sweet self and do not equate your performance or behavior or actions with your dear, sweet self.



While Dr. Burns using the term “self-esteem,” if you read carefully, you will discover that he advises that most elegant solution to so called “low self-esteem” is to give up the idea of self-esteem entirely.



WE RECOMMEND : The words of that brilliant, 20th Century philosopher, Popeye the Sailor-man who frequently said


I yam what I yam and dats all what I yam.


BOTTOM LINEIf you want to start feeling better about yourself, right now, today, STOP calling your dear, sweet self names.  And as long as you are doing so, please stop calling the dear, sweet selves of others names.  It will change your life.  Honest!

We would love to hear your reactions, comments and personal experiences.  If you try this, please let us know how you are doing.  There are many good books which can help including “A Guide to Rational Living,”  “How to stubbornly and “The Myth of Self Esteem” all by Dr. Ells.



f there is anything I can do for you, do not hesitate to contact me.





How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 4

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Originally posted 2017-03-21 21:08:40.

Follow me
Latest posts by Rex Alexander (see all)
Please share the love . . .

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Join discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018-2024 All rights reserved.
This site is using the Desk Mess Mirrored Child Child-Theme, v2., on top of
the Parent-Theme Desk Mess Mirrored, v2.5, from BuyNowShop.com

Never miss a post!

Don't let this happen you you!
Get FREE weekly Newsletter Digest of New Posts

We respect your privacy.